Elis Token Saver
$1,170.94 saved per user in 30 days.
80% less than running the same work solely on a frontier flagship.
How it works
- 1. Your team asks like normal. Nothing changes about the AI tools people already use.
- 2. Elis plans the work into a short chain of smaller tasks.
- 3. Each task gets the right-size model. Only the hard parts touch the big ones.
- 4. You see the savings, per user — every run is tracked and attributed, so spend is visible seat by seat.
Statement of Account
One user, 30 days, itemized
pay-per-token equivalent: the same reported tokens priced at per-token API rates on a frontier flagship, vs the right-sized models actually used
| Savings reported (one user) | $1,170.94 |
| Elis's cut | $8.66 |
| Plans run | 444 |
| Plans per active day | ~29 |
| Reported vs planning estimate | ~27× |
Elis charges a fee on the saving it estimates when it plans the work, fixed at that moment. Across the window above that came to $8.66 — under 1% of the savings reported. It is not a share of your model bill.
Figures are in dollars. Token counts vary by provider and are not comparable across hosts, so we don’t publish them.
Priced both ways
| Saved | 80% |
Step-level measurement across 167 plans and 669 measured steps — the same account and window as the figures above, summed before the dashboard's step filters (which is why the dollar saving here is larger than the reported figure).
Figures are pay-per-token equivalents. On a subscription, Token Saver saves usage against your allowance rather than per-token dollars — you get more work from the same plan.
Sample: one real production account — a power user running ~29 plans a day. Reported, not projected; not an average-user claim. Collection since 2026-08-18; 15.5 active days inside the 30-day window.
At team scale
The same figure, multiplied
This is the measured per-user number times a seat count — arithmetic, not a measured team result. It holds only for people who use AI as heavily as the account above.
| Power users | Per 30 days (per-user figure multiplied) |
|---|---|
| 5 | $5,854.70 |
| 25 | $29,273.50 |
| 100 | $117,094.00 |
Arithmetic on a single measured account, not a measured team result. A team saves this much only to the extent its people use AI as heavily as the measured user.
However you pay
You may be paying for more model than the work needs
Token Saver doesn’t change what you ask for. It changes how the work is structured and where each step runs — so the same result costs less of whatever it is you’re spending. Which is why the saving shows up in two different places.
If you pay per token
The bill is what moves. If everything you send today lands on one big model, you are paying flagship rates for the easy majority of it — the routing, the lookups, the tidy-ups.
Right-sized instead of sent whole to a frontier model, the same work came out 80% lower on the account above.
If you’re on a subscription
You don’t buy tokens per request, so nothing gets cheaper — you get further. The saving arrives as headroom instead of dollars.
The same plan allowance stretches: more tasks finished before you hit a limit, and fewer of them burned on work a small model could have handled. Same subscription, more done with it.
Either way the mechanism is identical — break the request into steps, then send each step to the smallest model that can finish it properly.
Handled for you
A full orchestration layer, not just a router
Everything below is machinery a team would otherwise have to build, run and tune themselves. Here it runs behind every request, gets better on its own as it learns from outcomes, and keeps itself current as providers change what they will serve. Nothing on this list is your job.
Task chains
One request rarely maps to one model call. Yours is broken into a chain of smaller tasks, with the independent ones run side by side.
Elis plans the chain, runs it in order, and re-plans around a step that fails. You never write it.
Agents
An agent is a reusable expert that carries its own rules and knowledge, so your setup isn't re-explained on every request.
Each task is matched to the agent that has earned the best results on work like it — nothing to configure, no prompt library to maintain. When you do want a named specialist of your own, your organization can create one: describe the job and Elis drafts its recipe — the tasks, tools and rules it runs — or author that recipe yourself. From there it has to earn its traffic on measured outcomes, the same as every other agent.
Embeddings
To pull in the right context, text is turned into vectors and searched by meaning rather than by keyword.
Elis sizes the embedding model to each chunk, so small chunks never pay for a heavyweight one. No vector database to run, index, or tune.
Embedding backups
An embedding can only be read back by the model family that wrote it, so a retired embedding model can strand the context it encoded.
A copy is kept in each embedding space your tenant can actually serve, up to a redundancy cap, and anything stored without real embedding capacity is re-embedded once capacity returns. Draining a dead space is a supported migration, run deliberately rather than on its own.
Caching
Long context you send again and again — a system prompt, a large file — can be cached at the provider instead of charged at full price every time.
Elis asks for the caching and measures what it returns; the discount shows up on your ledger rather than being invisible.
Stored results
The output of a plan that worked is grounding for the next one — but only if it is kept somewhere it can be searched.
On the paid program a finished plan's result is scrubbed, safety-scanned, stored inside your own tenant and embedded for later grounding. Nothing leaves that tenant unless you opt a specific artifact into sharing.
Tooling
Search, browsing, code execution and the rest each have their own reliability and speed.
Tools are bundled and ranked by measured reliability, latency and fit — not by whatever happens to be installed.
Heuristics
Every run produces an outcome worth remembering: how good it was, how long it took, what it cost.
All of it is recorded as a signal, per agent, per model, per tool — which is what makes the next run cheaper.
Self-learning
The routing rules are not fixed. What works gets promoted; what stops working gets demoted.
Semi-supervised and reinforcement learning drive that, and new strategies ship behind canaries so they have to earn their traffic before they carry it. The agents govern themselves on that evidence: a candidate is trialled against the incumbent it would replace, and one that cannot beat it never carries live work.
Proven chains
A plan that worked is worth more than its answer: the order of tasks that produced it is reusable on the next request like it.
A chain is only recorded as proven once it has been graded and settled, not merely finished — and it can then be recalled for a similar goal instead of being planned again from scratch.
Anomaly detection
A system like this degrades quietly: one model's quality drifting down, more work falling back to a larger tier than it used to, the pool running short of nodes.
Elis scans its own telemetry for those patterns and raises them as alerts with the cause attached. Detection is kept separate from repair on purpose — the alert names the problem rather than quietly rewriting something behind you.
Failure handling
When a call fails, something has to decide how far the blame reaches — the node that ran it, the credential it used, or the model itself.
Each class is sorted to its own radius automatically: a bad execution quarantines that one node, a dead credential disables everything sharing it, a rate limit pauses that key's nodes for a while rather than the model. One bad call never takes out a provider.
Deprecation
Providers retire models and drop older versions on their own schedule. A routing table that still lists them fails on your time, not theirs.
A background health cycle decommissions the nodes behind any model flagged deprecated, and cross-checks the catalogue against what each provider will still serve — where a call the provider actually rejects counts for more than an absence from a published list. Retirements hold; the history is kept.
The comparison
The same work, priced both ways
One comparison, and only one: your host agent sending everything straight to frontier models — the exact baseline every figure here was measured against — versus the same work planned and right-sized through Elis. No competitor scorecards, no borrowed benchmarks. Skim the numbers first; each carries its own basis.
Which model runs each task
Without Elis
Everything lands on the biggest model by default, so flagship rates apply to the easy parts as much as the hard ones.
With Elis
Each request is split into tasks, and each task runs on the smallest model that can finish it well — only the hard parts touch the big ones.
Work you have already solved
Without Elis
Every request is planned from scratch. A task shaped like one you paid to solve last week is planned, run and paid for again in full.
With Elis
A chain of tasks is recorded as proven only once it has been graded and settled — and a proven chain can then be recalled for the next goal like it instead of being planned again.
How the strategy improves
Without Elis
A static prompt setup runs the same on day 200 as on day 1. Nothing grades it against an alternative, and nothing retires what has stopped working.
With Elis
Candidate strategies ship behind canaries and have to beat the incumbent in live trials before carrying your work — 738 of 1,529 were rejected at that gate and never carried live traffic.
What you can see of the spend
Without Elis
One number on an invoice. Which model ran which task — and what any single task cost — is invisible, so the spend can be paid but not audited.
With Elis
Usage is measured per task and attributed per user and per organization — and you are charged on the savings actually reported, not on a promise.
80%
lower cost for the same work
one production account over 30 days, pay-per-token, priced both ways against a frontier flagship — one user, not an average
93.86%
lower inference cost
measured in our own studies, on our own platform traffic, against a frontier baseline — method on /proof
1.8x
the work from one plan allowance
a token ratio, measured across 508 plans on our own platform — it does not convert to a dollar figure
738 of 1,529
candidate strategies rejected
failed the live trial against the incumbent and never carried live traffic — full record on /proof
The baseline everywhere on this page is the same one: your own host agent running directly on frontier models. Nobody else is named or measured here — the counterfactual is your current default. Dollar ratios do not transfer to a subscription allowance; the token ratio does. Nothing here is modelled, borrowed, or extrapolated. Full method, counterfactuals and the raw record: /proof.
Regulated environments
Isolated tenants, by default
Your organization’s work runs on your organization’s hardware — and that isolation is the same mechanism the savings run on, not a bolt-on. Every request resolves against your tenant’s policy before a model is ever chosen, and every run is metered and attributed back to the user and org that made it.
Designed for HIPAA / HITECH, ITAR / EAR, NERC CIP, FISMA / NIST and PCI-DSS environments. If you have a boundary to hold, tell us what it is and we’ll tell you straight whether we can hold it.
Connect your host
Works with the AI tools you already use
Pick your tool for a step-by-step setup guide.
Honest numbers
Early usage is reporting savings well beyond what Elis predicts at planning time — the account above reported roughly 27× its planned estimate over the same 30 days.
The sample is one user, not an average. Every figure on this page comes from a single production account over 15.5 active days inside a 30-day window. We publish it per user because that is the unit we actually measured — not because we have measured a team yet. A lighter user saves less; a team of them saves more.
We show savings in dollars, not tokens: every provider counts tokens differently, so one company’s 1,000 tokens can be another’s 500. Dollars are the one unit that compares fairly. Your own dashboard tracks reported savings the same way, per user and across the organization.
On a subscription, savings show up as more use from the same plan allowance — you don’t buy tokens per request, so every seat’s subscription simply goes further. The dollar ratio above doesn’t carry over to a plan allowance, but the token count does: across 508 plans on our own platform the same work took 44.8% fewer tokens — about 1.8× the work from one allowance.
In hours rather than tokens: a developer whose weekly cap runs out on Thursday reaches Friday evening instead, and a limit that used to bind after about five hours of heavy use stops binding inside a working day. Per hundred seats, the output of roughly a hundred and eighty.
Contact us
Work out what this is worth on your team
Tell us which AI tools your people use today and roughly how many use them. We’ll come back with what Token Saver would have to prove on your own usage — and how to measure it. You can also write to us at support@tryelisai.com.